Finally saw it this afternoon... and it was okay. I liked the book alot better and was amazed at some of the stuff that they left out and other parts that they took great liberties in.
I'd give this 2 1/2 out of 4 stars.
I liked the acting and the locations (what was funny is that I visited the Louvre and Westminister Abbey just last month).
Here are my gripes (highlight to read):
- Losing the inner cryptic and using the inner ones password to open the outer cryptic was strange to me, but I can see how those who haven't read the book wouldn't pick it up.
- Using the 'library card' -- ahem -- internet ready cel phone to get the A. Pope clue was a bit dumb-down. I liked the interaction of the librarian when she recognized Langdon.
- Interrupting his book signing rather than pulling him out of bed in the middle of the night. I thought the latter was more dramatic.
- Showing Teabing over the body of Remy... it was too early to show him. Couple that with Sophie's seeing the dust tracks of the shoeprints and cane marks and the twist is ruined before it happens.
- Silas getting shot right there rather than being found dead in the park.
- The omission of her brother at the end and the gathering of the 'priory' folks.
- I was really upset that Aringarosa told the council what he was going to do with the money. That whole rearrangement made me cringe and it didn't help the story.
And my likes:
+ I loved the flashbacks in history while Langdon and Teabing were talking.
+ I also liked the 'effects' that were used while Langdon was solving the anagrams and the cryptic.
I would have liked the movie to have been a half an hour longer and a few things weaved back in. I wouldn't have minded it much. Since I had read the book first, I think I was a bit biased walking in.
I won't be buying the DVD, but if I could borrow it from someone I might watch it again.
One last thing... I had no problem with the central plot of the film or book and see it as quite plausable.
I'd give this 2 1/2 out of 4 stars.
I liked the acting and the locations (what was funny is that I visited the Louvre and Westminister Abbey just last month).
Here are my gripes (highlight to read):
- Losing the inner cryptic and using the inner ones password to open the outer cryptic was strange to me, but I can see how those who haven't read the book wouldn't pick it up.
- Using the 'library card' -- ahem -- internet ready cel phone to get the A. Pope clue was a bit dumb-down. I liked the interaction of the librarian when she recognized Langdon.
- Interrupting his book signing rather than pulling him out of bed in the middle of the night. I thought the latter was more dramatic.
- Showing Teabing over the body of Remy... it was too early to show him. Couple that with Sophie's seeing the dust tracks of the shoeprints and cane marks and the twist is ruined before it happens.
- Silas getting shot right there rather than being found dead in the park.
- The omission of her brother at the end and the gathering of the 'priory' folks.
- I was really upset that Aringarosa told the council what he was going to do with the money. That whole rearrangement made me cringe and it didn't help the story.
And my likes:
+ I loved the flashbacks in history while Langdon and Teabing were talking.
+ I also liked the 'effects' that were used while Langdon was solving the anagrams and the cryptic.
I would have liked the movie to have been a half an hour longer and a few things weaved back in. I wouldn't have minded it much. Since I had read the book first, I think I was a bit biased walking in.
I won't be buying the DVD, but if I could borrow it from someone I might watch it again.
One last thing... I had no problem with the central plot of the film or book and see it as quite plausable.
Comment